Sponsored Links

Featured Links

Other Topics
Sponsored Links







Quote of the Day

"Inanimate objects can be classified scientifically into three major categories; those that don't work, those that break down and those that get lost."

Russell Baker






Click here for eBay Motors!


 






 
Featured Mutual Funds Articles

No Load Mutual Funds: Investment Hype vs. Investment Help
With the internet such a huge part of our daily lives, many investors have access to a wide range of instant investment information. Whether you’re into stocks, bonds, mutual funds, futures or options, there are tons of electronic investment newsletters ...

Be Cautious When Studying Mutual Fund Ratings
Categories: Investing Wherever you look, you will find various rating systems on mutual funds, each of which uses a different approach. All of them are designed to weed through the thousands of funds to get to the best ones. But is there really such ...

The Top 10 Reasons to Invest in Mutual Funds
Everyone who follows the financial news has heard of mutual funds and knows the stock market has generally risen (with various ups-and-downs) for over 200 years. In fact, by most measures, the stock market has made more money for more people, and done it ...




Be Cautious When Studying Mutual Fund Ratings
 

Categories: Investing

Wherever you look, you will find various rating systems on mutual funds, each of which uses a different approach. All of them are designed to weed through the thousands of funds to get to the best ones. But is there really such a thing? Does a high rating really mean a fund will do better in the future? Many people seem to think so. A recent study showed that Morningstar, North America's most recognized rating system for funds, has a tremendous influence on fund sales. If Morningstar gives a five-star rating, those funds typically enjoy increased sales as a result.

While ranking providers are careful to warn investors that their ratings don't foretell the future, the star system is, unfortunately, used by some investors as if they were reading Consumer Reports to purchase a new drill. Supporters of the ranking approach argue that there's no subjective component to the star rating. It isn't determined by an analyst's review, and can't change simply because the service dislikes the fund's manager or its investment strategy. And that's good.

Performance will vary. Fund performance often falls off and risk levels rise during the subsequent three years after a fund is given an initial five-star Morningstar rating, suggests another recent study by Matthew Morey, a professor at Pace University. One reason for this is that after receiving a five-star rating the size of the fund grows dramatically, which then makes the fund unwieldy to manage, he suggests. Since Morey's study was completed, Morningstar also has changed the way it doles out top rankings to make them more precise. One of the biggest problems with all rating systems is that they are not necessarily predictive in nature. This means they're not really set up to tell you whether certain funds will necessarily do better in the future. For the most part, the ratings indicate how much you might have made and how much aggravation you faced in the process.

Combining risk and return. For example, one five-star fund might post moderate return scores, but incredibly low risk scores. Another five-star fund might have much higher-risk scores, but its return score could be strong enough to help it still rank in the top 10% of the pack.

In some cases, in fact, it's not even the same fund to begin with. Remember, after a management change, the rating stays with the fund, not the portfolio manager. Therefore, a fund's rating might be based almost entirely on the track record of a manager who is no longer with the fund.

Understand how the ratings were developed. Too many people put emphasis on the results without knowing how the results were achieved. If you are going to use ratings, take the time to understand how they were developed and what they really mean. It is not the destination but the journey that counts.

Past performance is no guarantee of the future. You have probably heard this disclaimer a thousand times before, but it is really important to understand. Most rating systems have little to no predictive element in them. It's natural to think that the best performer of the past will be the best performer in the future. Unfortunately, it's not that simple. Just think about it; if it were that easy, investors would just continue to buy last year's winners knowing that they will be this year's winners. And that seldom works.

Ratings are a very important element in trying to distinguish between good and bad funds. Good research, however, goes far beyond just looking for five stars or an A+. When evaluating funds, look at the quantitative, measurable characteristics of a fund: returns up against the benchmark, costs, risks, taxes and manager tenure. Use rating systems as part of your research, but remember: just because the analysts give them top marks, it does not mean they will be the best investment in the future, and doesn't it mean that they'll be the best investment for you in particular. Take the time to understand how the ratings were achieved. This will be the first step to educating yourself about funds.

About the Author:
http://www.seguin-associates.com Seguin & Associates Financial Services Ltd. is a financial planning service located in Windsor, Ontario. They are dedicated to the delivery of professional retirement planning, estate planning, tax planning and life insurance.

Copyright Seguin & Associates Financial Services - http://www.seguin-associates.com



Written By: Seguin & Associates Financial Services


Google


Mutual Funds News

Indian shares open 0.4 pct higher, Reliance up - CNBC
MUMBAI, Nov 19 (Reuters) - India's main share index opened 0.37 percent higher on Wednesday and quickly extended gains to over 1 percent on bargain buying after falling 15 percent in the previous five sessions. Reliance Industries and ICICI Bank led ...

Mutual Funds: Buying In Bearville - Forbes
Yesterday, Standard & Poor's released its actively managed mutual funds scorecard for the first half of 2008. Active managers didn't fare well. Over five years, both domestic and global funds have been beaten by their benchmarks 70% of the time. Also ...

5 Mutual Funds (Almost) Bucking the Bear - US News and World Report
It's official: So far this year, not a single diversified U.S. stock fund has made money. Given this week's unrelenting market declines, that shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Just about any mutual fund that's in the black right now is one that's ...

Stock Mutual Funds Saw $31.8B Outflow Thu-Wed - TrimTabs - Wall Street Journal
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Stock mutual funds saw an outflow of $31.8 billion during the week ended Wednesday, compared with an inflow of $2.2 billion during the previous week, according to TrimTabs Investment Research estimates. For the week ended ...

Taxable distributions could shock mutual fund investors - Austin American-Statesman
CHICAGO — A required year-end practice by mutual funds is about to whack many people with capital gains taxes at the cruelest of times: when funds already have declined by as much as 40 percent this year. Even though a fund's value has declined, it ...